Archive

Author Archive

what would you do if I sang out of tune?

January 31st, 2012 6 comments

In case you haven’t heard, Kandidate Karaoke is now on the elections schedule: Grad House, Thursday, February 9th @ 9PM).  This event first made a semi-official appearance last year and has already resulted in a few memorable moments.  Campaigning in campus bars is strictly verboten, and although an exception is made for the presidential candidates during the debate in the Grawood, it sounds like no such exception will be made for this event.  This gives candidates a mid-campaign-period break, an opportunity to put down their rhetoric and pick up a microphone.  A chance to swap vague promises for vaguely on tune singing.

In honour of this new event, punditry.ca is pleased to present the Top Five Election Candidate Karaoke Moments From Outside the DSU (The Title Needs Work).

(Inserting a break to keep the embedded Youtube videos off the main page, click Read More to continue.)

Read more…

Tags:

the early bird gets worms

January 17th, 2012 10 comments

DSU Elections season is upon us – a month or two early.  Yes, Virginia, nominations open on January 23rd, voting takes place February 14-16th, and the period in the middle will be occupied by a) punditry and b) fodder for punditry.   dsuelections.ca is live and has all the details.  The motivating factors for the move include the hope that moving the elections timeline further from the end of the semester will be easier on candidates, improve voter turnout, and give those who don’t win a position more time to make backup plans.

Since we know that punditry.ca receives almost no traffic outside of the DSU Elections, the only people who will see this notice will be those who already know the elections are upon us.  Fortunately I don’t consider “being ineffectual” a good enough reason to not post something.

If you are interested in joining the punditocracy, use the submit news link to reach us, or reach out to a 2011 pundit.  As always, if you have news, rumours, press releases, or announcements, we’d like to hear about it.  We are particularly interested in knowing potential candidates and about anyone intending to create a SuperPAC.

Tags:

seven years of voter turnout

March 13th, 2011 4 comments

Turnout over 7 years of DSU Elections

This graph shows cumulative votes over time for seven elections.  Not shown is the 2007 student spaces referendum, which was so good it won’t even fit on this graph.  Also not shown is the 2004 turnout, which similarly makes every other year look bad. The axes are unlabelled (SACRILEGE!) but I believe in context it is fairly obvious what is shown here.  The smoothing is artificial; the number of votes was sampled every hour.  2009 starts so high because there was advanced polling that year.

The past three years ended up clustered closely together, just under the 2500 mark.  This year blew by all three years, falling just shy of the 3,000 mark.  Some things to note:

  • 2007, the best turnout shown, I suspect benefited from the publicity of the 2007 student spaces referendum
  • 2006 is notable for being the closest set of races since the ’02 elections, with every executive position going to multiple ballot rounds to find a winner.
  • 2011, I do not know what the cause is.  The races weren’t particularly close, there was a mildly contentious referendum question but that was a fairly localized show… perhaps the CRO was especially vigorous? Or the candidates especially outgoing?  Any thoughts here?
  • I know 2011 is the best of the past four years, the fourth best over the last 10 years, and am quite convinced it holds fourth at least as far back as 1980 (Dalhousie went from 2,000 to 9,000 students in the 1960-1980 period, and the larger the student body the harder it is to reach. With paper ballots and 14k students, voter turnout was hovering in the 3%-8% range.)
  • You can see the spikes when an email went out to students. Although there was mention of the election in the Dal Sticky Notes on the first day, there is no sharp spike (that might have led to generally higher turnout over the corresponding periods in previous years).  The real spike came when the DSU dispatch went out early on the 3rd day (it was actually sent in the afternoon of the 2nd day but wasn’t approved until the morning of the 3rd). This resulted in the most votes received on the third day since we started keeping track of when people vote.

There are many more observations to be made; add your own!

Tags:

the results

March 10th, 2011 24 comments

The CRO is planning to release the results in batches throughout the evening, starting roughly at 9 and drawing it out for an hour or two.  @ersnow will be live-tweeting the results; if you aren’t following him, we’ll copy the results to a page here for your enjoyment.

Update: Submission to tipline reports turnout of 18.3%. Nice!

Grad Student Referendum: Yes [83%]

Loaded ladle: Yes [71%]

Senators: Yes and Yes

BoG: Ma [33%] & Griffin [32%]

VP Internal: Kayla Kurin [51%]

VP Student Life: Jamie Arron [56%]

VP Academic & External: Sarah Bouchard [53%]

President: Chris Saulnier [57%]

SAN Theme: Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory

Tags:

punditry predicts…

March 8th, 2011 64 comments

Polls are open.

After the frenetic activity of campaign week, these three days always feel calm, and peaceful.  ”Election? Really? Oh, right, I dimly recall hearing something about that.”  Sure, for somewhere between 20-100 people (depending on the number of people personally invested in the results) it’s a time of anxious waiting.  For the Elections Committee, there’s a whole new level of busy-ness.

But for pundits, it’s just idle time.

Luckily for us, we have a time-honoured pastime: predicting the winners.  Head to the comments to offer your best prediction, prophecy, or prognostication.  A Preeminent Punditry Prognosticator will be named.

Remember, blind monkeys can pick winners – we like to predict the point spread, excluding spoiled ballots.  But we’ll take input from blind monkeys if that’s all you’ve got.  If you don’t predict a majority for an executive candidate on the first ballot, just note who will win and on which round.  Feel free to take a stab at voter turnout, too.

Odds-making is also a welcomed activity.

So – go predict! Fame and glory await you!

Tags:

Top 10 Platform Ideas of the 2011 DSU Elections

March 8th, 2011 5 comments

Welcome guest writer Henry Whitfield.  Henry is a generally respected commenter on punditry, very experienced with residence life on campus, and was under the microscope last year as a candidate in the DSU Elections.


It’s a shame that each and every year, the Punditry comment section turns into a cesspool of anonymous complainers, attacks and bashing of candidates or other commenters.

Often the commenters and pundits lose track of the reasons why these students put themselves out there in an election and focus on the negatives.

These students are putting themselves out there, pushing aside their studies and playing politics to help bring about positive change to our student union.

While some are openly ridiculed, others are popularly supported and some disappear after elections, it’s important to remember that without these candidates we wouldn’t have a democratically elected executive to represent the student body.

With that being said, I took the time to read through each candidate’s platform and have put together the highlights of some of the best ideas put forth this election.

I am always wary of candidates who throw out a hundred promises, but fail to put the ‘how’ in their platform. Without providing how they are going to identify or fix the issues and implement changes, candidates might as well promise to eliminate winter and have 365 days of summer.

Now, these are ‘highlights’ in my opinion only and I actively encourage others to post their own in the comment section.

So without further adieu, here’s my Top 10 Platform Ideas of the 2011 DSU Elections:

10. Transparency, Presidential Candidate Sebastian Fiszman

- Many students, myself included, are unaware of what their DSU Member fees actually go towards and as Fiszman points out in his platform, he had to inquire to find a copy of the current budget. He promises to “to modernize the website to enable the easy, rapid, secure and reliable upload of financial records and other important documents that pertain to student issues.“

9. Academic & External Commissioner, A&E Candidate Sarah Bouchard

- Sarah puts forth the idea of a A&E Commissioner, “The A&E Commissioner will act as a year-round ANSSA liaison to our student population to foster greater input and dialogue.”

8. Grawood House Band, VP Student Life Candidates Jamie Arron and Adam Reid

- A blast from the past maybe, but being able to offer something consistent to the Grawood would help create an identity for a bar that sometimes doesn’t seem to know whether it is a wing house, pub, bar or club.

7. Accessibility Council Rep, A&E Candidate Karl Dempsey

- Another one of those ‘buzz words’ that seem to be very popular during election periods, but are often forgotten throughout the rest of the year. Adding a representative to council to help push these issues and bring them to council can only help moving forward.

6. Opening up the Union, Presidential Candidate John Hillman

- At times Hillman comes across a little ‘unconventional’ but his ideas come from experience and are often founded in common sense. Opening up the Union as he puts it, is something that needs to be done to get more involvement. He writes, I will post a ridiculous number of signs leading the way to council meetings on the nights that they are occurring. I‘m talking one every ten feet or so, with giant arrows on them. I will also actively remind students that council meetings are open to the public.”

He also promises to read student emails out at each council meeting, more input on issues can’t hurt the process.

5. Co-Curricular Transcripts, PresEdential Candidate Chris Saulnier

- This is a no brainer to me and to many out there that the extra involvement students put in during their years of study should be recognized in an official capacity. Saulnier points out that he has been actively involved in the process and pledges to have it implemented by September; he also points out that the steering committee will be chaired by the President-elect.

4. Getting Council Minutes online, Presidential Candidate John Hillman

- Another idea born out of common sense, it’s something that is brought up in council and elections year after year. He promises the following, “Put a record of every friggin’ council meeting online. I‘ll bring my own camera if need be. Whatever it takes, I will end the executive minutes curse.”

3. Grawood VIP System, VP Student Life Candidate Tom Dobbyne

- How do you get students to go to the campus bar? Offer them something that isn’t offered downtown already. Dobbyne writes,offering students the chance to receive rewards for coming to the bar on a regular basis, be that cheaper specials, free coat check, reserved tables at big events such as Dal’s Got Talent and the Superbowl and being able to skip the line during busy periods.”

2. Keeping DSU Website Updated, VP Internal Candidate Chris Connors

- I can count on one hand how many times I’ve visited the DSU website this year, and when asking friends, some have never been. The problem? There is very little on the site you can’t get elsewhere, better updated. It has improved ten-fold this year, but it still needs improvement. Connors’ promise is simple, but if executed can bring purpose to a website that has been the bane of many an executive.

1. Earlier Election Period, PresEdential Candidate Chris Saulnier

- This may not seem important right off the bat, but the election period and process is crucial to each and every executive we elect year after year. An earlier period for elections helps newly elected candidates gain even more on the job training. I’ve also got my fingers crossed this includes better support for the CRO when they are elected, it’s a big job.

** While I read all platforms, if I missed crediting you above, please let us know and we’ll update the post **

Tags:

Loaded Ladle Referendum – Business Plan Summary

March 6th, 2011 35 comments

I got a tip from a student who emailed the DSU President and the Loaded Ladle to request copies of their business plan.  No one replied. (The loaded ladle DID add him to their mailing list and send him a campaign email.  He was not impressed.)  I appluaded his efforts, and was able to provide a copy. If you want The Real Document, the only online source I know is a Scribd Document.  Since there does appear to be at least some interest in knowing the plan beyond “feed students”, I summarize the plan below.

To put my biases on the table, I am a believer in local food.  One of my favorite parts of going home to my family is access to vegetables grown in our garden, fresh eggs, fresh milk, meat from animals grown on the farm (pork, beef, chicken, and maybe mutton soon), and more.  It’s a luxury not available to most people and almost never to students.  I think providing it to students is a Good Idea – if they want it.  I’m not wild about the idea of paying a society an annual fee to promote a political view, but recognize that this is already done for a number of student organizations. I don’t agree that I am unethical because I eat meat. I believe that organic farming is 95% PR. The Loaded Ladle Levy will not affect me in any way, so I have no particular passion one way or another.

I tried to keep my biases, and any opinions about the contents, out.  But sometimes I just can’t help myself, so you’ll see an opinion about science and another about governance.  Nothing major.

It should be noted that this is a plan and is subject to change.  In particular, the DSU has not endorsed this plan, and discussion elsewhere on this page indicates that the Society Review Committee may make some modifications.  Still, the goals and intent of the organization are of interest, regardless of whether or not they can be carried out.

  • Mission is “providing an ethically-sourced food service”, “public forum available for all students to join and participate”, “educate the public on the food politics on campus and social and environmental issues which surround food”, and “use food to build a greater sense of community”.
  • Students will support directly (via $2 levy) and indirectly through the DSU ($500 grant and an unvalued in-kind donation to provide space in SUB. A table in the lobby isn’t that substantial; a dedicated kiosk is quite substantial. Since I can’t fairly assess the value of this expected donation, it is not included in budget figures).
  • Total start-up costs: $11,900.00, basically all equipment, but that includes “$40,250 of short and long-term assets” which are unspecified.
  • “At least” one food serving per week [edited Mar 7 to add 'at least']
  • “At least” 200 students expected per serving. (Anyone know attendance now?)
    • Doing the math for you: if the minimum is achieved exactly (it could be more, it could be less…), that’s 6400 meals a year, at $5.31 a meal (based on total expected revenue).
  • $1 per meal for non-students
  • A market analysis is provided, but it’s based on a “study” which isn’t cited and I can’t find using Google. No methodology is described. Poorly labeled graphs are shown. I won’t dignify them by including them here; scientifically, they aren’t worth the bytes they consume on my hard drive.  I was so annoyed after reading about this “Research” that I had to go do something else for a while.
  • Three coordinators: Outreach, Operations, and Events.
  • Revenue mostly from levy
  • Budgeting for a $12,000 surplus, with a $2500 emergency fund (“unallocated”). Given the dominance of the word “Food” in the word cloud, it is a bit surprising to see it only make up 30% of the budget.  Figure to the right; categorization of the expenses is mine, but I stand by it.
  • Budgeting for 25 opt-outs
  • Salaries are actually “Honoraria” [ugh, hate that word], earmarked for “Speakers and presenters”. [added Mar 7]
  • Surplus to be used to “enhance the organization’s operations.”
  • Future plans included permanent space in the SUB.
  • Details on bulk food prices.
  • Sample menu. I personally would eat 7 of the 17 proposed dishes. (I don’t like most beans. Or tofu.).
  • Actual name is Dalhousie Food-Cooperative.
  • Although Dal students all pay a levy, they are not automatically members (huh?) and cannot vote in AGM, elections, or… anything.  (My comment: I think it’s pretty bitchy to ask every Dal student to pay an annual levy to support you, but not automatically give them voting privileges.)
  • You can be a member if you sign up for the mailing list (“Ally List”), which is open to anyone in the world who wants to do so.  You’ll get periodic mail updates. You can also volunteer.
  • Only members of the “Ally List” or volunteers can vote.
  • Governed by an 8-member board that will have minimum three Dal student members.  Other 5 can be from anywhere. (You must be a volunteer and have volunteered twice to serve on the board.) Board elected at AGM.
  • Quorum is 2/3rds; decisions made by consensus or by agreement of 80% of board members.
  • AGM decisions made by consensus or 2/3rds vote; only “Ally members” and volunteers can vote.
  • Board members must subscribe to the ideology of the Loaded Ladle.

If you think I missed something crucial, let me know in the comments.  Finally, the word cloud:

Tags: